BlazeDS vs GraniteDS vs WebORB vs LifeCycleDS for business applications on Flex and Java

October 26, 2008

Filed under: Software — Tags: BlazeDS, GraniteDS, LifeCycleDS, WebORB — Artem @ 10:11 AM

Here is the table of features I managed to find:

Feature	BlazeDS	GraniteDS	WebORB	LifeCycleDS
Data management Services
Client-Server synchronization	-	+	+	+
Conflict resolution	-	-	+	+
Data paging	-	+	+	+
SQL adapter	-	-	+	+
Hibernate adapter	-	+	+	+
Document Services
LiveCycle remoting	-	-	+	+
RIA-to-PDF conversion	-	-	+(plugin)	+
Enterprise-Class Flex application services
Data access/remoting	+	+	+	+
Proxy service	+	+	+	+
Automated testing support	-	-	+(through RIA AppPuncher –coming soon)	+
Software clustering	+	+	+	+
Web tier compiler	-	+	+	+
Flex code generation	-	+	+	-
Enterprise Integration
WSRP generation	-	-	-	+
Ajax data services	+	-	+	+
Flex-Ajax bridge	+	-	-	+
Runtime configuration	+	-	+	+
Open adapter architecture	+	-	-	+
JMS adapter	+	+	+	+
Server-side component framework integration	+	+	+	+
Stateful services (session scope for Java objects)	-	+	+	?
Singleton services (application scope for Java objects)	-	+	+	?
Server-to-client method invocation	-	-	+	?
ColdFusion integration	-	-	+	+
Service browser displaying POJOs, Spring beans, EJBs and a list of deployed JAR files	-	-	+	-
Offline Application Support
Offline data cache	-	-	+	+
Local message queuing	-	-	+	+
Real – Time Data
Publish and Subscribe messaging	+	-	+	+
Real -time data quality of service	-	+	+	+
RTMP tunneling	-	-	+	+
Frameworks build-in integration
Spring	-	+	+	-
EJB3	-	+	?	-

I used the following articles:

thanks man!! great work,i´m actually using weborb

Comment by decosume — February 25, 2009 @ 6:20 PM
Great comparation.

I tried BlazeDS, but I saw it doesn’t handle Lazy. Now I’m trying GraniteDS but I can’t run it..so, maybe I’ll try WebOrb.

Comment by Ricardo — May 29, 2009 @ 2:08 PM
Hi Artem,

Can you post the chart I have on my blog? The chart you have above doesn’t line up the x’s in the correct place so it looks like WebORB supports very little when in fact it is probably the most robust of the bunch. You can see my chart here: http://mcoderkat.wordpress.com/2009/02/08/weborb-for-java-vs-blazeds-vs-lcds/ I might add that we do offer WebORB on a perpetual license basis (not reflected in the chart). Also, we decided to put AppPuncher in the Cloud, so our cloud-based version for stress testing is nearly ready for launch. Interested parties can go to http://www.cloudpuncher.com to register as a beta tester.

Thanks for posting this comparison Artem.

Cheers,
Kathleen

Comment by Kathleen — September 16, 2009 @ 12:59 PM

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.